'Totality of Evidence' Approach in the Development of GP2017, an Approved Adalimumab Biosimilar.

INTRODUCTION: Hyrimoz®, (GP2017 [SDZ-ADL]), is a biosimilar to Humira® (REF-ADL). SDZ-ADL was approved in 2018 by both the United States Food and Drug Administration (US FDA) and European Medicines Agency (EMA) for the indications of REF-ADL not protected by orphan exclusivity. In 2023, the US FDA and EMA also approved a citrate-free high-concentration formulation (HCF) of SDZ-ADL. TOTALITY OF EVIDENCE-THE APPROACH: Approval of SDZ-ADL was based on data gathered using the US FDA, EMA and World Health Organization (WHO)-recommended step-wise Totality of Evidence approach. This approach is a robust dataset confirming high confidence in analytical, functional, pharmacokinetic (PK) and clinical biosimilarity between the biosimilar and reference medicine determined through analytical and clinical investigation. EVIDENCE OF BIOSIMILARITY: Evidence supporting the biosimilarity of SDZ-ADL and REF-ADL was reported at each stage of investigation. Comprehensive comparative analytical and functional assessments demonstrated that SDZ-ADL was analytically indistinguishable from REF-ADL in required critical quality attributes, including receptor binding. Phase I clinical data showed PK similarity of SDZ-ADL and REF-ADL in healthy volunteers, with similar safety, tolerability and immunogenicity profiles. Phase III confirmatory efficacy and safety studies, ADACCESS (included in US/EU dossiers) and ADMYRA (separate to US/EU dossiers), both confirmed that SDZ-ADL's efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity matched REF-ADL in all patient groups with no clinically meaningful differences. More recently, this data package was the basis for a citrate-free HCF of SDZ-ADL to be developed, and its PK, safety and immunogenicity were confirmed against the initially approved formulation of SDZ-ADL. CONCLUSION: Overall, the Totality of Evidence provided for biosimilar adalimumab, SDZ-ADL, confirmed the analytical, functional and clinical similarity of SDZ-ADL to REF-ADL, supporting its regulatory approval and providing a data bridge with which to evaluate and support the approval of citrate-free HCF SDZ-ADL for clinical use.

A biosimilar is a type of medicine that is designed to match the structure and function of a 'reference' biologic medicine. Hyrimoz^® (SDZ-ADL) is a biosimilar of the adalimumab reference medicine, Humira^® ([REF-ADL]). SDZ-ADL was approved in the US and Europe in 2018. For SDZ-ADL to be approved, a collection of evidence needed to be created, called the 'Totality of Evidence.' The purpose of this collection of data is to show there is a high confidence that the new biosimilar medicine matches the reference medicine, from the structure of the medicine to the effect of the medicine on the human body. For SDZ-ADL, this investigation started with comparing the physical structure and other functional properties of SDZ-ADL versus REF-ADL and ended with clinical studies in both healthy volunteers and in patients with diseases treated with adalimumab. This Totality of Evidence gathered for biosimilar adalimumab, SDZ-ADL, confirmed the similarity of SDZ-ADL to REF-ADL and therefore supported the approval of SDZ-ADL. In 2018, a citrate-free high-concentration version (high concentration formulation [HCF]) of REF-ADL was launched that matched REF-ADL. HCF REF-ADL has since become the primary formulation of REF-ADL used in practice. In 2023, a HCF version of SDZ-ADL was also approved in the US and EU based on evidence confirming that HCF SDZ-ADL matched SDZ-ADL. As SDZ-ADL had been previously confirmed to match the reference medicine, this meant that HCF SDZ-ADL could be directly compared against SDZ-ADL to confirm biosimilarity and support its approval.

Efficacy and safety of tildrakizumab for the treatment of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis of the scalp: A multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, Phase 3b study.

BACKGROUND: Scalp psoriasis is common and difficult to treat. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate efficacy and safety of tildrakizumab for the treatment of scalp psoriasis. METHODS: In this Phase 3b, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study (NCT03897088), patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis affecting the scalp (Investigator Global Assessment modified [IGA mod] 2011 [scalp] ≥3, Psoriasis Scalp Severity Index [PSSI] ≥12, ≥30% scalp surface area affected) received tildrakizumab 100 mg or placebo at W0 and W4. The primary endpoint was IGA mod 2011 (scalp) score of "clear" or "almost clear" with ≥2-point reduction from baseline at W16 (IGA mod 2011 [scalp] response). Key secondary endpoints were PSSI 90 response at W12 and W16 and IGA mod 2011 (scalp) response at W12. Safety was assessed from adverse events. RESULTS: Of patients treated with tildrakizumab (n = 89) vs placebo (n = 82), 49.4% vs 7.3% achieved IGA mod 2011 (scalp) response at W16 (primary endpoint) and 46.1% vs 4.9% at W12; 60.7% vs 4.9% achieved PSSI 90 response at W16 and 48.3% vs 2.4% at W12 (all P <0.00001). No serious treatment-related adverse events occurred. LIMITATIONS: Only short-term data are presented. CONCLUSION: Tildrakizumab was efficacious for the treatment of scalp psoriasis with no new safety signals.

Vaccination recommendations for adults receiving biologics and oral therapies for psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis: Delphi consensus from the medical board of the National Psoriasis Foundation.

BACKGROUND: For psoriatic patients who need to receive nonlive or live vaccines, evidence-based recommendations are needed regarding whether to pause or continue systemic therapies for psoriasis and/or psoriatic arthritis. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate literature regarding vaccine efficacy and safety and to generate consensus-based recommendations for adults receiving systemic therapies for psoriasis and/or psoriatic arthritis receiving nonlive or live vaccines. METHODS: Using a modified Delphi process, 22 consensus statements were developed by the National Psoriasis Foundation Medical Board and COVID-19 Task Force, and infectious disease experts. RESULTS: Key recommendations include continuing most oral and biologic therapies without modification for patients receiving nonlive vaccines; consider interruption of methotrexate for nonlive vaccines. For patients receiving live vaccines, discontinue most oral and biologic medications before and after administration of live vaccine. Specific recommendations include discontinuing most biologic therapies, except for abatacept, for 2-3 half-lives before live vaccine administration and deferring next dose 2-4 weeks after live vaccination. LIMITATIONS: Studies regarding infection rates after vaccination are lacking. CONCLUSION: Interruption of antipsoriatic oral and biologic therapies is generally not necessary for patients receiving nonlive vaccines. Temporary interruption of oral and biologic therapies before and after administration of live vaccines is recommended in most cases.

Efficacy of Roflumilast Foam, 0.3%, in Patients With Seborrheic Dermatitis: A Double-blind, Vehicle-Controlled Phase 2a Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance: Current topical treatment options for seborrheic dermatitis are limited by efficacy and/or safety. Objective: To assess safety and efficacy of roflumilast foam, 0.3%, in adult patients with seborrheic dermatitis affecting the scalp, face, and/or trunk. Design, Setting, and Participants: This multicenter (24 sites in the US and Canada) phase 2a, parallel group, double-blind, vehicle-controlled clinical trial was conducted between November 12, 2019, and August 21, 2020. Participants were adult (aged ≥18 years) patients with a clinical diagnosis of seborrheic dermatitis for a 3-month or longer duration and Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) score of 3 or greater (at least moderate), affecting 20% or less body surface area, including scalp, face, trunk, and/or intertriginous areas. Data analysis was performed from September to October 2020. Interventions: Once-daily roflumilast foam, 0.3% (n = 154), or vehicle foam (n = 72) for 8 weeks. Main Outcomes and Measures: The main outcome was IGA success, defined as achievement of IGA score of clear or almost clear plus 2-grade improvement from baseline, at week 8. Secondary outcomes included IGA success at weeks 2 and 4; achievement of erythema score of 0 or 1 plus 2-grade improvement from baseline at weeks 2, 4, and 8; achievement of scaling score of 0 or 1 plus 2-grade improvement from baseline at weeks 2, 4, and 8; change in Worst Itch Numeric Rating Scale (WI-NRS) score from baseline; and WI-NRS success, defined as achievement of 4-point or greater WI-NRS score improvement in patients with baseline WI-NRS score of 4 or greater. Safety and tolerability were also assessed. Results: A total of 226 patients (mean [SD] age, 44.9 [16.8] years; 116 men, 110 women) were randomized to roflumilast foam (n = 154) or vehicle foam (n = 72). At week 8, 104 (73.8%) roflumilast-treated patients achieved IGA success compared with 27 (40.9%) in the vehicle group (P < .001). Roflumilast-treated patients had statistically significantly higher rates of IGA success vs vehicle at week 2, the first time point assessed. Mean (SD) reductions (improvements) on the WI-NRS at week 8 were 59.3% (52.5%) vs 36.6% (42.2%) in the roflumilast and vehicle groups, respectively (P < .001). Roflumilast was well tolerated, with the rate of adverse events similar to that of the vehicle foam. Conclusions and Relevance: The results from this phase 2a randomized clinical trial of once-daily roflumilast foam, 0.3%, demonstrated favorable efficacy, safety, and local tolerability in the treatment of erythema, scaling, and itch caused by seborrheic dermatitis, supporting further investigation as a nonsteroidal topical treatment. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04091646.

Tapinarof cream 1% once daily for the treatment of plaque psoriasis: Patient-reported outcomes from the PSOARING 3 trial.

BACKGROUND: Tapinarof cream 1% once daily demonstrated significant efficacy versus vehicle and was well tolerated in two 12-week, phase 3 pivotal trials in adults with mild-to-severe plaque psoriasis. OBJECTIVE: To assess long-term, health-related quality of life and patient satisfaction with tapinarof. METHODS: Patients completing the 12-week trials were eligible for 40 weeks of open-label tapinarof based on Physician Global Assessment score in PSOARING 3, with a 4-week follow-up. Dermatology Life Quality Index was assessed at every visit; Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire responses were assessed at week 40 or early termination. RESULTS: Seven hundred sixty-three (91.6%) eligible patients enrolled; 78.5% completed the Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire. DLQI scores improved and were maintained. By week 40, 68.0% of patients had a DLQI of 0 or 1, indicating no impact of psoriasis on health-related quality of life. Most patients strongly agreed or agreed with all Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire questions assessing confidence in tapinarof and satisfaction with efficacy (62.9%-85.8%), application ease and cosmetic elegance (79.9%-96.3%), and preference for tapinarof versus prior psoriasis therapies (55.3%-81.7%). LIMITATIONS: Open-label; no control; may not be generalizable to all forms of psoriasis. CONCLUSIONS: Continued and durable improvements in health-related quality of life, high rates of patient satisfaction, and positive perceptions of tapinarof cream were demonstrated.

Drugs in Development for Chronic Spontaneous Urticaria.

BACKGROUND: Chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) is a debilitating disease for which many patients are inadequately treated. However, recent advancements in our understanding of the disease pathophysiology allow us to develop therapies that are more effective for CSU. It may be possible in the future to select personalized treatments based on a patient’s autoimmune endotype. This paper reviews current knowledge on CSU pathogenesis and treatment. It also reviews data for drugs being developed for the treatment of CSU, as listed on ClinicalTrials.gov. J Drugs Dermatol. 2023;22(4): doi:10.36849/JDD.7113 Citation: Nguyen W, Liu W, Paul S. Yamauchi PS. Drugs in development for chronic spontaneous urticaria. J Drugs Dermatol. 2023;22(4):393-397. doi:10.36849/JDD.7113.

Sixty Years of Benzoyl Peroxide Use in Dermatology.

BACKGROUND: Benzoyl peroxide (BPO) has been used extensively in industry and health care for more than a century and has been approved for the treatment of acne for over 60 years. Recently, BPO received a second approved indication by the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of rosacea. Topical BPO use has historically been limited by tolerability, photosensitivity, oxidation, and, uncommonly, contact allergy. Research has led to enhanced efficacy and tolerability, as well as the combination of BPO with other topical medications. These advances have allowed extended use of BPO in additional dermatologic conditions that may not have been feasible in the past. Additionally, the role of BPO in preventing antibiotic resistance cannot be underestimated. Here, we discuss the historical limitations of BPO and recent advances developed to overcome these limitations. We also describe newly approved BPO medications and their role in aiding antibiotic stewardship. J Drugs Dermatol. 2023;22(1):54-59. doi:10.36849/JDD.7150.

Therapeutic application of machine learning in psoriasis: A Prisma systematic review.

Dermatology, being a predominantly visual-based diagnostic field, has found itself to be at the epitome of artificial intelligence (AI)-based advances. Machine learning (ML), a subset of AI, goes a step further by recognizing patterns from data and teaches machines to automatically learn tasks. Although artificial intelligence in dermatology is mostly developed in melanoma and skin cancer diagnosis, advances in AI and ML have gone far ahead and found its application in ulcer assessment, psoriasis, atopic dermatitis, onychomycosis, etc. This article is focused on the application of ML in the therapeutic aspect of psoriasis.

Effect of Roflumilast Cream vs Vehicle Cream on Chronic Plaque Psoriasis: The DERMIS-1 and DERMIS-2 Randomized Clinical Trials.

Importance: Once-daily roflumilast cream, 0.3%, a potent phosphodiesterase 4 inhibitor, demonstrated efficacy and was well tolerated in a phase 2b trial of patients with psoriasis. Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of roflumilast cream, 0.3%, applied once daily for 8 weeks in 2 trials of patients with plaque psoriasis. Design, Setting, and Participants: Two phase 3, randomized, double-blind, controlled, multicenter trials (DERMIS-1 [trial 1; n = 439] and DERMIS-2 [trial 2; n = 442]) were conducted at 40 centers (trial 1) and 39 centers (trial 2) in the US and Canada between December 9, 2019, and November 16, 2020, and between December 9, 2019, and November 23, 2020, respectively. Patients aged 2 years or older with plaque psoriasis involving 2% to 20% of body surface area were enrolled. The dates of final follow-up were November 20, 2020, and November 23, 2020, for trial 1 and trial 2, respectively. Interventions: Patients were randomized 2:1 to receive roflumilast cream, 0.3% (trial 1: n = 286; trial 2: n = 290), or vehicle cream (trial 1: n = 153; trial 2: n = 152) once daily for 8 weeks. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary efficacy end point was Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) success (clear or almost clear status plus ≥2-grade improvement from baseline [score range, 0-4]) at week 8, analyzed using a Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test stratified by site, baseline IGA score, and intertriginous involvement. There were 9 secondary outcomes, including intertriginous IGA success, 75% reduction in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) score, and Worst Itch Numeric Rating Scale score of 4 or higher at baseline achieving 4-point reduction (WI-NRS success) at week 8 (scale: 0 [no itch] to 10 [worst imaginable itch]; minimum clinically important difference, 4 points). Results: Among 881 participants (mean age, 47.5 years; 320 [36.3%] female), mean IGA scores in trial 1 were 2.9 [SD, 0.52] for roflumilast and 2.9 [SD, 0.45] for vehicle and in trial 2 were 2.9 [SD, 0.48] for roflumilast and 2.9 [SD, 0.47]) for vehicle. Statistically significantly greater percentages of roflumilast-treated patients than vehicle-treated patients had IGA success at week 8 (trial 1: 42.4% vs 6.1%; difference, 39.6% [95% CI, 32.3%-46.9%]; trial 2: 37.5% vs 6.9%; difference, 28.9% [95% CI, 20.8%-36.9%]; P < .001 for both). Of 9 secondary end points, statistically significant differences favoring roflumilast vs vehicle were observed for 8 in trial 1 and 9 in trial 2, including intertriginous IGA success (71.2% vs 13.8%; difference, 66.5% [95% CI, 47.1%-85.8%] and 68.1% vs 18.5%; difference, 51.6% [95% CI, 29.3%-73.8%]; P < .001 for both), 75% reduction in PASI score (41.6% vs 7.6%; difference, 36.1% [95% CI, 28.5%-43.8%] and 39.0% vs 5.3%; difference, 32.4% [95% CI, 24.9%-39.8%]; P < .001 for both), WI-NRS success (67.5% vs 26.8%; difference, 42.6% [95% CI, 31.3%-53.8%] and 69.4% vs 35.6%; difference, 30.2% [95% CI, 18.2%-42.2%]; P < .001 for both). The incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events was 25.2% with roflumilast vs 23.5% with vehicle in trial 1 and 25.9% with roflumilast vs 18.4% with vehicle in trial 2. The incidence of serious adverse events was 0.7% with roflumilast vs 0.7% with vehicle in trial 1 and 0% with roflumilast vs 0.7% with vehicle in trial 2. Conclusions and Relevance: Among patients with chronic plaque psoriasis, treatment with roflumilast cream, 0.3%, compared with vehicle cream resulted in better clinical status at 8 weeks. Further research is needed to assess efficacy compared with other active treatments and to assess longer-term efficacy and safety. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifiers: NCT04211363, NCT04211389.

Treatment of Scalp Psoriasis.

Scalp involvement is seen in a majority of individuals with psoriasis, a chronic autoimmune skin disease with variable phenotypes. Occasionally, isolated scalp involvement is observed; and this causes significant psychosocial morbidity. Management of scalp psoriasis is difficult, in part due to the difficulty of applying topical agents and its refractory nature. Various treatment options are available with variable efficacy. Topical agents include topical steroids, keratolytics, tar and anthralin compounds, vitamin D analogues, and vitamin A derivatives. The combination treatment of topical betamethasone and calcipotriene is the most effective topical therapy. Systemic agents include conventional agents such as methotrexate, cyclosporine, and oral retinoids. Biologics offer a greater efficacy, with near complete or complete clearance of the scalp. In this article we review the published literature on adult and scalp psoriasis to highlight its treatment. Articles published in peer-reviewed journals were included for qualitative analysis of the literature, including reviews, clinical trials, case series, case reports published in the electronic database (MEDLINE/PubMed) through June 2021, cross references of respective articles, and trials from clinicaltrials.gov. J Drugs Dermatol. 2022;21(8):833-837. doi:10.36849/JDD.6498.

New Biologics and Oral Drugs in Treatment of Moderate to Severe Psoriasis.

Psoriasis is known to have no definitive cure, which is in common with other inflammatory disorders. Various treatment options are available, and they help in decreasing the disease activity and improving symptoms. These therapeutic agents are administered according to disease severity. The improvement is assessed by the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) and Investigator Global Assessment (IGA), in which the appearance and extension of the lesions are taken into account. We searched for English-language literature regarding phase 2 and phase 3 trial drugs in the treatment of psoriasis in the following databases: PubMed, Scopus, Embase, Google Scholar, The Cochrane Library, and EBSCO, Clinicaltrials.gov. The keywords used include psoriasis, biologics, plaque psoriasis, systemic treatments, IL17 inhibitors, phase 2 trial, JAK inhibitor, and IL12/23 inhibitors. The search included only articles published in English.J Drugs Dermatol. 2022;21(8):826-831. doi:10.36849/JDD.6443.

Treatment of Nail Psoriasis.

Nail psoriasis has a considerable negative impact on the quality of life by limiting the patient’s household chores, professional activities and social interactions. Treatment for nail psoriasis is often overlooked with treatment for skin and joint involvement being more emphasized. It is also challenging since the clinical improvement takes a long time to be observed and is often met with poor compliance with treatment. This review focuses on the various treatment options for nail psoriasis after review of literature. The literature research considered published journal articles (clinical trials or scientific reviews). Studies were identified by searching electronic databases (MEDLINE and PubMed) and reference lists of respective articles. Only articles available in English were considered for this review. J Drugs Dermatol. 2022;21(2):146-150. doi:10.36849/JDD.4969.

Intralesional Mode of Drug Administration in Psoriasis.

The use of various conventional systemic and topical therapies in psoriasis has resulted in various major and minor side effects. Hence, we need to switch to intralesional administration of antipsoriatic drugs, to achieve better safety and efficacy profile. Intralesional drug therapy is most suitable for scalp, nail, and localized and recalcitrant plaque psoriasis. However, there are specific drugs, which can be used for this purpose, under strict monitoring. We have attempted to review all the possible drugs and indications where intralesional administration is feasible, along with their efficacy, adverse effects, dosage, and recommended duration of treatment. J Drugs Dermatol. 2022;21(2):186-190. doi:10.36849/JDD.6196.

Secukinumab dosing every 2 weeks demonstrated superior efficacy compared with dosing every 4 weeks in patients with psoriasis weighing 90 kg or more: results of a randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: Obesity is a common comorbidity of psoriasis and can attenuate response to biologic treatment. OBJECTIVES: To investigate the efficacy, safety and tolerability of secukinumab 300 mg every 2 weeks (Q2W) vs. secukinumab 300 mg every 4 weeks (Q4W) in patients with a higher bodyweight. METHODS: In this multicentre, double-blind, parallel-group trial, 331 patients with moderate-to-severe chronic plaque psoriasis weighing ≥ 90 kg were randomized to receive secukinumab 300 mg Q2W or secukinumab 300 mg Q4W. Patients who did not achieve Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) 90 at week 16 on the Q4W regimen were reallocated to remain on the Q4W regimen or uptitrate to Q2W. RESULTS: At week 16, Q2W dosing (n = 165) led to significantly higher PASI 90 responses vs. Q4W [n = 166; 73.2% vs. 55.5%, one-sided P-value = 0.0003, odds ratio estimate (95% confidence intervals): 2.3 (1.4-3.8)]. At week 52, higher efficacy responses were maintained in the Q2W arm (n = 165) vs. Q4W (n = 83); PASI 75: 88.9% vs. 74.8%; PASI 90: 76.4% vs. 52.4%; PASI 100: 46.7% vs. 27.3%; Investigator's Global Assessment 0/1: 75.9% vs. 55.6% and Dermatology Life Quality Index 0/1: 66.1% vs. 48.8%. PASI 90 nonresponders at week 16 who uptitrated to Q2W (n = 31) showed higher efficacy responses at week 32 (16 weeks post-uptitration, PASI 90: 38.7% vs. 16.5%) vs. those who remained on Q4W (n = 40). Safety results were comparable across treatment arms and consistent with the established secukinumab safety profile. CONCLUSIONS: Secukinumab 300 mg Q2W demonstrated superior and sustained efficacy compared with Q4W in patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis weighing ≥ 90 kg. PASI 90 nonresponders derived additional benefits from uptitration to a Q2W regimen (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03504852). What is already known about this topic? Obesity is a common comorbidity of psoriasis and can attenuate response to biologic treatment. Secukinumab is a fully human monoclonal antibody that selectively neutralizes interleukin-17A in the treatment of moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis. Subgroup analyses of previous study results and pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic modelling data suggest that heavier patients may benefit from higher exposure to secukinumab through an increased dosing frequency [300 mg every 2 weeks (Q2W) vs. every 4 weeks (Q4W)]. What does this study add? Over 52 weeks, secukinumab 300 mg Q2W demonstrated superior efficacy compared with secukinumab 300 mg Q4W in patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis weighing ≥90 kg, with comparable safety results, consistent with the established secukinumab safety profile. In patients who did not achieve PASI 90 at week 16 on the Q4W regimen, uptitration to the Q2W regimen at week 16 resulted in improved efficacy responses through week 52 after switching.

Psoriasis: Embarking a dynamic shift in the skin microbiota.

Recent interest has arisen regarding the role of microbiome and its composition in the pathogenesis of psoriasis. Numerous studies have shown that there are alterations in skin flora arrangement between normal individuals and psoriatic patients. Psoriasis exacerbation could be interconnected with epidermal or mucosal colonization with streptococci, Malassezia, Staphylococcus aureus, or Candida albicans. The role of cutaneous and gut microbiome in psoriasis pathogenesis has recently been studied in both human and animal models. In this review, we try to evaluate various pathogenic mechanisms linking the microbiota and psoriasis. The literature research included peer-reviewed articles which included clinical trials, original reports, and scientific reviews. MEDLINE and PubMed databases were searched from January 1990 to March 2021, including the reference lists of articles meeting our criteria.

Real-World Satisfaction with Secukinumab in Clearing the Skin of Patients with Plaque Psoriasis through 24 Months of Follow-Up: Results from US Dermatology Electronic Medical Records.

INTRODUCTION: Information on the long-term treatment satisfaction with secukinumab for patients with plaque psoriasis in real-world settings is limited. The objective of this study was to describe real-world treatment satisfaction in patients with plaque psoriasis who initiated secukinumab using data from an electronic medical records-based dermatology database. METHODS: Patients aged ≥ 18 years with plaque psoriasis in Modernizing Medicine Data Services' affiliate's database who received secukinumab 3/1/2018-1/21/2020 were included. Satisfaction with the treatment's effectiveness in clearing the skin of psoriasis was evaluated using a 5-point Likert scale during the 12-month baseline period and at 6-, 12-, 18-, and 24-month postindex visits for the overall population and at 6-, 12-, and 18-month postindex visits for subgroups stratified by prior biologic and systemic therapy use. Additionally, satisfaction levels were assessed among patients who were unsatisfied with treatment at baseline. RESULTS: Overall, 82.3% agreed that secukinumab was effective in clearing their skin at 6 months, which was maintained through 12 (81.7%), 18 (83.3%), and 24 months (81.4%). Similar results were observed in biologic-experienced/naive and systemic-experienced/naive patients. Overall mean (SD) treatment satisfaction improved from 2.49 (1.36) at baseline to 1.77 (1.06) at 6 months, with similar improvements in satisfaction scores reported at each follow-up period up through 24 months. Of the patients who were not satisfied at baseline, 77.9% reported being satisfied with their treatment at 6 months, which continued through 12 (74.4%), 18 (82.8%), and 24 months (71.4%). Patients receiving secukinumab experienced meaningful changes in percent affected body surface area and Physician Global Assessment scores that were sustained through 24 months, regardless of prior treatment experience. CONCLUSIONS: These real-world findings highlight the high level of sustained satisfaction with secukinumab treatment for improving and maintaining skin clearance in patients with moderate-to-severe disease, regardless of prior treatment experience.

Antihistamines in Psoriasis.

Psoriasis is polygenic, interleukin (IL)-17 and IL-23 driven chronic relapsing inflammatory multisystem disease caused by a complex interplay of endogenous and environmental factors. The most common and distressing symptom in psoriasis is itch, adding significantly to the burden of disease. Although histamine has historically not been considered a key itch mediator in psoriasis, there is some evidence from the literature that antihistamines may be effective to reduce itch in psoriasis. This review focuses on the role of antihistamines in the management of itch in psoriasis. The literature search included peer-reviewed articles published in English language (clinical trials or scientific reviews). Studies were identified by searching electronic databases (MEDLINE and PubMed) until January 2021 and by reference lists of respective articles. J Drugs Dermatol. 2021;20(8):844-847. doi:10.36849/JDD.5966.

Bimekizumab versus Adalimumab in Plaque Psoriasis.

BACKGROUND: Bimekizumab is a monoclonal IgG1 antibody that selectively inhibits interleukin-17A and interleukin-17F. The efficacy and safety of bimekizumab as compared with the tumor necrosis factor inhibitor adalimumab in patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis have not been extensively examined. METHODS: We randomly assigned patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis in a 1:1:1 ratio to receive subcutaneous bimekizumab at a dose of 320 mg every 4 weeks for 56 weeks; bimekizumab at a dose of 320 mg every 4 weeks for 16 weeks, then every 8 weeks for weeks 16 to 56; or subcutaneous adalimumab at a dose of 40 mg every 2 weeks for 24 weeks, followed by bimekizumab at a dose of 320 mg every 4 weeks to week 56. The primary end points were a 90% or greater reduction from baseline in the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) score (PASI 90 response; PASI scores range from 0 to 72, with higher scores indicating worse disease) and an Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) score of 0 or 1, signifying clear or almost clear skin (scores range from 0 [clear skin] to 4 [severe disease]), at week 16. The analysis of the primary end points tested noninferiority at a margin of -10 percentage points and then tested for superiority. RESULTS: A total of 614 patients were screened, and 478 were enrolled; 158 patients were assigned to receive bimekizumab every 4 weeks, 161 to receive bimekizumab every 4 weeks and then every 8 weeks, and 159 to receive adalimumab. The mean age of the patients was 44.9 years; the mean PASI score at baseline was 19.8. At week 16, a total of 275 of 319 patients (86.2%) who received bimekizumab (both dose groups combined) and 75 of 159 (47.2%) who received adalimumab had a PASI 90 response (adjusted risk difference, 39.3 percentage points; 95% confidence interval [CI], 30.9 to 47.7; P<0.001 for noninferiority and superiority). A total of 272 of 319 patients (85.3%) who received bimekizumab and 91 of 159 (57.2%) who received adalimumab had an IGA score of 0 or 1 (adjusted risk difference, 28.2 percentage points; 95% CI, 19.7 to 36.7; P<0.001 for noninferiority and superiority). The most common adverse events with bimekizumab were upper respiratory tract infections, oral candidiasis (predominantly mild or moderate as recorded by the investigator), hypertension, and diarrhea. CONCLUSIONS: In this 56-week trial, bimekizumab was noninferior and superior to adalimumab through 16 weeks in reducing symptoms and signs of plaque psoriasis but was associated with a higher frequency of oral candidiasis and diarrhea. Longer and larger trials are required to determine the efficacy and safety of bimekizumab as compared with other agents in the treatment of plaque psoriasis. (Funded by UCB Pharma; BE SURE ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03412747.).